Sections 302, 324, 114, 148 and 149 convictions, attempted to commit murder, present on conviction, disorderly assault with a deadly weapon, crime by a member of the unlawful assembly in the prosecution of the common object. Testimony The controversial account trial court failed to establish that the FIR was attributed to the accused accused of motivating the accused and not to the current accused because the victim faced the murder case of the victim's brother. Yes, the deceased accused was anecdotal evidence in this case. No weapons were recovered from the suspects then the single blank cartridge was recovered from the scene after being attached to the commission of the crime The ballistic expert contradictions were not sent in the witness statements from where the accused was located. The suspects raised the suspects. His presence at the scene of the crime commission is not an independent event. He had evidence to link the commission of the crime against the accused, the illegal prosecution of the co-accused who admitted that The accused has been murdered for revenge for the murder of his brother. The complainant was falsely implicated in this case and the witnesses who were relatives needed independent action to prove the crime in an inter-death trial, the prosecutor had to prove his case and the prosecution's weakness did not benefit. Could lift The accused, who failed to prove his case, was acquitted of the charge
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
