MST. DADLI versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT PAKISTAN RAILWAYS, SUKKUR
Sections 15 and 17 of the Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional application obligations, the parties to the payment during the proceedings were the legal heirs of the late worker and among them the dispute between service insecurity, group insurance, GP fund, monthly pension and staff charitable fund. Was about privilege. While applying under section 15 of the Payment of Wages Act, 1936, the authorities made some payments to the widow of the deceased employee, the payment of wages was allowed to appeal under section 17 of the Pay Act, 1936, and to the authority. The order given by him was considered valid. The Labor Court should, however, reasonably seek to dispute the amount decided by the Authority under the Wages and Payment Wages Act, 1936, the Labor Court also dealt with the effect of paying the victim's widow. Was ignored. In applying to the Authority under Section 15 of the Wages Act, 1936, in which it was drawn up as one of the respondents, the Authority specifically directed the authorities to investigate the matter. Investigate and initiate disciplinary proceedings against the relevant staff when the forum authorized by the court to decide the matter was under trial, then it was not justified or the payment of the deposed High Court widow. Logic refuses to place orders for payment of dues based on the calculation shown in the petition Which in fact is in dispute because the applicant had taken the proper legal procedures to file a petition under Section 15 of the Act, the payment of wages. , 1936, and permission to apply
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
