ACL, R1 Sindh Government Land (Allotment, Conversion and Cancellation of Exchange) Ordinance (III of 2001), Section 4 (2) of the Special Relief Act (I of 1877), Sections 42 and 54, of the Administration of Justice The injunction restraining the property, the plaintiff's infringement claiming that he was the owner of the suit land, and his complaint was that the defendants were already scrambling to end his trial but initially Only the injunction was granted, but the defendant dismissed the defendant and despite the restraints, the construction was still going on. Therefore, the trial court designated the recipient to protect the property from encroachers and land grabbers. The appointment of the recipient by the trial court was not intended to prejudice a party's case, but its sole purpose was to maintain the status quo in order to keep the matter in dispute. The parties and the question of their right to exercise their rights can be decided in the end or in relation to their case after the leading evidence of equality in relation to their case in any order passed by the trial court. Was found to be illegal or irregular and the suit property recipient was properly appointed for proper legitimate supervision and to protect the land from further encroachment and the High Court upheld the order of appointment of receiver. Was granted by the trial court
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
