Find a Lawyer

NIAZ ALI versus STATE

Section 497 (2) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 302/34 Qatil Im Bell, no further investigation granting the accused accused of committing murder by the FIR was not proposed and filed after the post-mortem. had gone. No defamatory article or any harsh substance was recovered which the role of the investigating officer was assigned to the accused. It was not for the cause of any injury. The only allegation against the accused was that he was arrested along with the accused. The accused was charged with further investigation. Guaranteed, in the circumstances

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011

• ZAFAR IQBAL v. State 2011 PCrLJ 150
• ASADULLAH MIRBAHAR v. Mrs. AYESHA MUZAHIR 2011 PLD 151
• Dr. FARAH NAZ v. PROVINCE OF SINDH through Secretary Labour Sindh 2011 PLC 153
• ABDUL REHMAN RANA v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN, MINISTRY OF EDUCATION 2011 PLC(CS) 155
• NELOFAR SAQIB v. SAIBAN BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS 2011 CLC 157
• Syed MUHAMMAD ARSALAN FAIZ v. State 2011 YLR 158
• FAROOQUE v. State 2011 PCrLJ 158
• MATEEN KAMAL v. State 2011 MLD 159

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2011 →

best advocate from Sibi lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes