Sections 4, 8, 13, 16 and 19 of the Pakistan Telecommunications (Reorganization) Act (XVII of 1996), Section 31 (1) of the Electronic Transaction Ordinance (LI of 2002), Constitution of Pakistan 36, and 37 of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional Application The petitioners complained that despite the suspension of the "Electronic Crime Prevention Ordinance, 2007", they were proceeding under the said ordinance, in the present case, section 4 of the Electronic Crime Prevention Ordinance, 2007. , 8, 9, 13 and 16 have been lodged a complaint. Section 31 (1) of the Pakistan Telecommunication (Re-organization) Act, 1996 and sections 36 and 37 of the Electronic Transaction Ordinance 2002 were filed against the Electronic Crime Prevention Ordinance, 2007, which was issued in 2007 , Which expired after 120 days of restraint. The Electronic Crimes Ordinance, being a provisional law of 2007 and was abolished, states that the ordinance cannot be continued under the law. The applicants were similarly terminated under the Electronic Crime Prevention Ordinance; however, other provisions of the law can be prosecuted as mentioned in the complaint according to the law. \ R \ n
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
