Find a Lawyer

versus SONERI BANK LTD.

Sections 42 and 54 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Section 151 Short Delivery of Auction Buyer The applicant's auction buyer complained that the full quantity of goods (sugar) purchased at auction was not provided by Official Assignee Pilia. Which was taken by the official Ishii. Short shipment of goods is hazardous to health and not suitable for human consumption; the order of accuracy supply in respect of 11,070 bags was issued by the state auctioneer against payment of Rs 1 32 crore by auction buyer but only 9708 bags of sugar supply auction buyer Auction buyer appeals for refund of remaining 1362 bags, High Court directs government official to request auction buyer be refunded according to short supply of goods Is gone

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011

• M. ASHRAF BULLO v. PAKISTAN INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES CORPORATION through Managing Director 2011 PLC 142
• ASIF RAZA v. FAROZAN MIRZA 2011 CLC 143
• SAEEDULLAH SOOMRO v. State 2011 YLR 144
• COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, COMPANIES-I, KARACHI v. HUMAYUN ELLAHI SHAIKH 2011 PTD 145
• AFAQ RIAZ AHMED v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN 2011 CLC 150
• ZAFAR IQBAL v. State 2011 PCrLJ 150
• ASADULLAH MIRBAHAR v. Mrs. AYESHA MUZAHIR 2011 PLD 151
• Dr. FARAH NAZ v. PROVINCE OF SINDH through Secretary Labour Sindh 2011 PLC 153

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2011 →

attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Tharo Shah lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes