Transfer of Section 24 and O VII, R 11 Case, Appeal Court for Remand for Trial Referring to the trial court's decision to dismiss the case approved by the trial court, the trial court's presiding officer accused of not receiving justice I was accused of being sacked. In the same terms which he had already rejected, the value of prejudice could not be raised on the basis of judicial prejudice because since a judge had already expressed a negative opinion in deciding such a case, The same may be true in other cases of this nature. Such a request does not mention any specific allegation against the Presiding Officer but there is no logic behind the alleged arrest of the plaintiff as the application under OVII, R 11, CPC is of a very different and limited nature. While deciding the application under O VII, the CPC, 11, the court only had to examine the contents of the plaintiff and not the evidence was obtained by the appellate court seeking remand for judgment on the case. After recording the evidence, the good thing is that in such circumstances there was misunderstanding in the arrest of the plaintiff and the law was not enforceable.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
