Section 497 Preventive Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 302, 337H (2), 34, 114, 148 and 149 convicted AMD, were affected by the haste or negligence that all the accomplices allegedly committed the complainant's father. Had committed murder and shared a common intention with the principal suspect and facilitated the murder if all persons, united with the common goal of any criminal offense, assisted in the execution. Their objection will be equally to blame. Reasonable grounds were available to understand that the accused had shared a common intention with all the accomplices in the commission of the murder, even though the accused was firing aerial with the accompanying suspects and caused no firearms injury. Did not bring The victim, but his undisputed presence at the scene of the incident, which was armed with weapons, revealed his intention of a planned concert with Principa to advance the joint thing. One of them was charged with interrogation and weapons armed men, including the accused, were waiting for the complaining party on the road and they picked up the temple and stopped the complaining party and killed his father. No explanation was offered to justify the suspect's presence at the scene of the incident. God was, which was born from the idea that the accused is temporary joint intention to commit the murder of the deceased but to show that there is no complainant to the party. The motive or reason for falsifying the accused in the trial was at an early stage
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
