MST. RUBINA KAUSAR versus DISTRICT POLICE OFFICER, SUKKUR
Article 199 Constitutional Jurisdiction High Court jurisdiction Termination of FIR The facts of the trial of the offense or innocence of the High Court accused in extraordinary cases if, under section 249A or 265, the trial under CRPC Can exercise jurisdiction without waiting for a court decision awaiting trial. Taking into account its certified central concern, whether the continuation of the proceedings before the trial court will be a waste of time, a waste of time and an abuse of court proceedings, if admitted and recorded on the basis of facts. However, no crime can be proved so it will be a misuse of legal proceedings as if the option of litigation without legality was without legality and could also be removed within the jurisdiction of the Constitution. Is. According to Article 199 of the Constitution, abolishing the matter was an unusual remedy that can only be asked in extreme cases. es; and said that the provisions can never be used as a substitute for a default trial. Or if a crime is committed first to decide the question of guilt or innocence, a general trial should not be allowed in front of the court, resorting to constitutional jurisdiction.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
