Article 2 302 and Q 34 of the Law of Martyrdom (1984 of the Ten), Article Qat Murder, praises the evidence of the acts of several persons in the joint intention offer whether the joint intention was already set or Was created / configured, it had to be set up properly. The fact of the joint intention was not proved beyond any reasonable doubt in this case, the trial court committed material irregularity by accepting the evidence of the witness regarding the accused's alleged confession before the police, who The testimony of the law was inadmissible under Article 40. In 1984, a two-year delay in blood staining was sent to a chemical executor, which would in some cases delay the credibility of the evidence where the blood-stained weapon / item was sent for chemical inspection with a delay, It depends on the circumstances and the nature and quality of the situation there. The testimony of the witnesses was irrelevant, the witnesses were not outraged by the accused and in their presence the place of the incident appeared to be natural. Medical evidence was according to the ocular testimony. The prosecution proved beyond reasonable doubt against the main accused in the case. Had made a mistake in the case of a co-accused whose appeal allowed the appeal of the accused high suspect was dismissed.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
