ARSHAD SALEEM versus CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY THROUGH AIRPORT MANAGER
Section 111 Civil Code of Conduct (v. 1908), Section 12 (2) Amendment to the Laws Ordinance (XII of 1972), Section 3 The responsibility of the director of the company to set aside the previous decision regarding the authority of fraud and misrepresentation The terms and conditions between the parties contracted with the company for installation of advertising and hoardings were stated that the transaction was signed and applied by the appellant, which was filed by the company against the company. The suit was ordered when the proceedings against the company proceeded, who was the director of the appellant company, when the previous judgment and order Upon learning of the deed, he filed an application under section 12 (2), CPC stating that he is a salaried director of the company and not a shareholder and has no obligation. Which the High Court has considered. Due to the fact that the service was affected and the business relationship between the appellant and the company was lost, the corporation / plaintiff's decision and litigation proceeded to appellant as a mere director of the company with the functions of the company and The actions cannot be held liable because the Company is a legal entity separate from its shareholders and directors. Unable to sue the Company, unless it is shown that under Section 111 of the Companies Ordinance, directors or shareholders did not accept any obligation to discharge such obligation, the improper order of 1984 was revoked. That the application was granted under section 12 (2) and the judgment and injunction against the appellant were set aside
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
