Earlier, the complainant designated five persons (other than the accused person) in the FIR, under Section 302, 337A (i) and 452 murder charges, which led to the benefit of doubt in the testimony of the secret and domestic testimony evidence. What happened, the crime and the police told the five arrested that, months after the incident, the complainant mentioned the names of the accused in his further statement as the prosecutor's witness, who was the complainant's son. Have also improved their statements, prosecutors said, adding that recording of such additional statements to improve the prosecution's case A delay of five months would be an important factor that could indicate that the second version contained in the statements was presented by the prosecutor after deliberation, which would have a negative impact. None of the advisers in the prosecution's case were examined for confirmation of Section H's version of the E-gun and rifle alleged crime weapon was not presented during trial at such The incident also raised doubts about the prosecution's case. And if only one situation raised doubt in the mind of the wise, then the benefit of the doubt was to increase in favor of the accused, not as a favor, but as a right prosecutor failed to prove his case, the trial court approved. The verdict was set aside and the accused was acquitted and ordered to be released.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
