Find a Lawyer

SAADAT HAYAT KHAN versus ZAHEERUDDIN

The provisions of the scope document referred to under Article 54 (a) of Article 54 (Statute of 1984 1984), Article 2 (a) (b) of the Sale Agreement, Laws, 1984, were such instruments. Were negotiated under the Instrument of Conversation Act, 1881. Section 3 and any such agreement shall not apply to Article 17 (b) of such Treaty on Evidence 17, 1984

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011

• TAYYAB RAFIQ BALAGAMWALA v. TRUSTEES OF PORT OF KARACHI through Chairperson KPT 2011 MLD 1311
• SAEED KHAN v. State 2011 YLR 1317
• Syeda ZAHIDA RIZVI v. THE STATE through D.S.P. 2011 YLR 1319
• ISMAIL v. State 2011 PCrLJ 1320
• KHADIJA EDIBLE OIL REFINERY (PVT.) LTD. 2011 CLD 1329
• Mrs. ABIDA SALEEM v. A.I. BROTHERS (PVT.) LTD. 2011 YLR 1334
• SAFAR-UR-REHMAN v. State 2011 PCrLJ 1334
• ABU BAKR v. LAL TAJ KHAN 2011 MLD 1339

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2011 →

famous lower court advocate from Musafir Khana lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes