Under section 497 (2) of the Constitution Regulation (XLV of 1860), section 448/386 of the Sindh Public Property (Termination of Expulsions) Act (V of 1975), section 7 (1) of the House, extortion and extradition guarantee, under section 448 Approval of further investigative offenses. , The PPC and the Sindh Public Property (Termination of Expenses) Act, 1975, did not fall under the prohibition clause under section 7 (1), section 497 (2), the PCP has been delayed for more than one year, the date, or No independent witnesses were mentioned in the alleged FIR of another accused, since the complainant had been in possession of the said plot for more than a year, as was the case in section 386. The PC also appeared to be missing in the wake of the allegations. The FIR, neither the time / date of the alleged offense under Section 6386, PPC, was mentioned, nor was it alleged that the accused had made threats or that he or she complained to the complainant. Had suffered severe distress or fear of extortion. Further investigation was made and the challan submitted to Section 6 contents6, the contents of the PPC and the challan submitted to the trial court, were dismissed, subject to the guarantees guaranteed under the circumstances, which it passed. \ r \ n
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
