SYEDA ZAHIDA RIZVI versus THE STATE THROUGH D.S.P.
Section 182 Criminal Code of Conduct (V 4 1898), sections 195 and 561 misrepresenting a government employee with the intention of using his legal power to injure another person, the nature of an offense under section 182, PPC Such was the case when an accused accused of such a crime was always tried in isolation for giving false information to a public servant so that he could use his legal authority to injure another person so that section 182, Under PPC, the accused should be tried for any crime or punished for committing such crime. Shall not be tempted by the attraction of false information, with such a magisterial trial shall be subject to a maximum of six months imprisonment or a fine of Rs 3000 or both, irrespective of the fact that false information provided by such accused is a crime. Which was exclusively heard through counter-terrorism. Court and death sentence or a minor offense punishable by up to a month. In the present case, nothing was available. A record to show that the public officer to whom the accused provided such information was under the complaint of the complainant by the investigating officer, from initiating proceedings under section 182. Previously the PCC court was not as PCC, according to the CRPC. It is necessary to give a show cause notice to the person who allegedly gave inaccurate information and to explain why a complaint cannot be filed against him under Section 182, PPC. Pleads that he / she has made a report under a misunderstanding, then he / she is entitled to provide proof of this effect and only when the magistrate
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
