Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SHAUKAT versus STATE

The release of the vehicle on Section 6 516 superintendent of applicants was canceled by the magistrate's order under which his application for release of his vehicle was dismissed. The applicant believed that he was not wanted in the case nor was the undercover vehicle declared a crime related to the case property charges. The aforesaid bail in the FIR is guaranteed, while the accused persons have been guaranteed, but the vehicle of the applicant was not issued to him. The order was set aside and the trial court was directed. To issue the vehicle to the applicant on the appropriate certificate. And identification, subject to the offer of solvent guarantee

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011

• NABI BUX v. State 2011 PCrLJ 1300
• Syed GHAZANFAR HUSSAIN v. NOORUDDIN 2011 CLC 1303
• WASEEM-UR-REHMAN BAIG v. PROVINCE OF SINDH through the Secretary, Health Department 2011 MLD 1303
• THE STATE through Chairman NAB, Islamabad v. ADAM KHAN 2011 YLR 1305
• TAYYAB RAFIQ BALAGAMWALA v. TRUSTEES OF PORT OF KARACHI through Chairperson KPT 2011 MLD 1311
• SAEED KHAN v. State 2011 YLR 1317
• Syeda ZAHIDA RIZVI v. THE STATE through D.S.P. 2011 YLR 1319
• ISMAIL v. State 2011 PCrLJ 1320

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2011 →

patent advocate from Guddu lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes