HABIB BANK LIMITED versus BAHJANI SCRAP TRADING COMPANY LLC
Section 13 and 44 of the Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Article 117, after obtaining foreign verdicts by the plaintiff, three courses are open to such plaintiff, and they are subject to section 44A, CPC Can take action under the foreign judgment. The country from which the decree is obtained is UK or any other jurisdiction and in this case the plaintiff can execute this decree clearly from the district court of the respective district of Pakistan and the plaintiff also needs to file a case. No and it doesn't have to go through the default procedure. For a jurisdiction trial, the second is that the plaintiff can file a case in Pakistan on the basis of a foreign judgment which is considered due to the process. In the second way, if the conditions set forth in Section 13 CPC are met, the decision between the parties is final and otherwise there is justice between them. He and such courts in Pakistan are bound to conclude that such a case is to be filed with the Lord within a period of six years as provided for in the case of the foreign judgment of the judgment as provided under Article 117 of the Limitation Act, 1908. The third course against which the plaintiff can file a lawsuit on the actual cause of action is because it does not end after the approval of the foreign judgment but remains so as long as the foreigner is satisfied with the decision if Section 13 C.P. If the conditions in C are not agreed, then the decree is open for a suicide attack in Pakistan
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
