Section 497 (5) Crimes (Special Courts) Ordinance (IX of 1984) in connection with Banks, Section 5 (7) bail, reduction of bail amount was not canceled The trial court awarded Rs 75 million to the accused. Bail granted in the case. Two guarantees of the same amount but at the request of the accused, the amount was reduced to Rs 41 million. The complainant believed that according to the provisions of section 5 (7) of the Orders of the Banks (Special Courts) 1984, the trial court should have fixed the amount of guarantees related to the gravity of the charge, the amount of bail was reduced by the banks (special) The courts) were in accordance with Article 5 (7) of the Ordinance, the complainant of 1984 did not cancel the bail on the first qualification and the bail was given to the accused, which was given to the Banks (Special Courts) Ordinance, 1984. 7), and no interference by the trial court of the High Court was called for any illegal or material misconduct. Once a ground was available for the complainant and it was not pressurized, then the court could not allow it to be pressured by the High Court even in the second round of litigation. Refused to cancel bail. In the circumstances the request was rejected
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
