Section 497 (2) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Sections 302, 504, 148 and 149, further inquiries into the incident of intentional infringement, firearm injury with intent to breach the security guarantee. Approval of the application was made in connection with the nominees after a report was made against the accused along with an unknown person because it is said that the characteristics of the unknown offender were not shown in the FIR of the unidentified offender. About ten days after the testimony of recorded witnesses, his arrest revealed that someone was not put on an identity test Through Raya, they find out that the arrested person was an unknown culprit. This is the afterthought, which brought a further inquiry into the case. A charge sheet has already been submitted, before the accused has been produced. The request for bail was rejected in the first instance court, by an order stating that the investigating officer refused to put it down. Arrested person for identification identification by complainant and other witnesses. But the request for bail was rejected on the basis that the witnesses disclosed the name of the arrested person (as the unidentified perpetrator of the incident) and had confessed to the police at the time of their arrest. The state attorney had no objection to the grant. On bail, the accused was admitted on bail
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
