Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AKRAM versus STATE

The value of the evidence seized under Section 9 (c) drug paraphernalia was sentenced to 14 years imprisonment and a fine that their defense evidence was not considered by the trial court. After the arrest of the accused, neither he nor his relatives had filed any document against the complainant in connection with his statements under Section 342 CCPC for years, 1999 and 2000, while The crime took place in 2004, an application was filed by a relative of the accused and the prosecution's witnesses were not parties to the proceedings, the prosecution may have testified. It should not be denied that he gave constant evidence on every aspect of the case. The High Court has denied that the conviction and enhancement of sentence imposed by the trial court on appeal was dismissed in the circumstances.

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011

• GULREZ LATIF BUTT v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry 2011 PLC(CS) 1422
• MUHAMMAD SHAFI alias PAPAN v. State 2011 PCrLJ 1424
• ABDUL LATIF v. State 2011 YLR 1429
• M.C.B. BANK LTD. v. DUTY FREE SHOP LTD. 2011 CLD 1430
• RAMZAN v. State 2011 MLD 1436
• ZULFIQAR ASHRAF v. State 2011 PCrLJ 1437
• MUHAMMAD SHAMIM v. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, KARACHI CENTRAL 2011 CLC 1441
• YASIR BIN MUHAMMAD v. State 2011 YLR 1446

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2011 →

law websites from Bewal lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes