MUHAMMAD BACHAL versus PROVINCE OF SINDH THROUGH HOME SECRETARY
Sections 16, 17, 20 and O VII, R 10 The territorial jurisdiction over the claimant's retrial was demolished by the defendant's property and was illegally demolished and the suit property was located by the defendants. While before the High Court, the case was filed on K. In its original civil jurisdiction, the provisions of VI VII, R 10, CPC were compulsory and a determination by the court of jurisdiction without a jurisdiction was not unconstitutional and binding when the court had disputed or territorial jurisdiction. In such cases, the claimant will have to return. No judicial order could be passed before the appropriate court and court proceedings, except that the action taken by the plaintiff in the return of the plaintiff shows that the plaintiff has no territorial jurisdiction over the jurisdiction of the High Court. There is no cause for such action, therefore, the plaintiff was returned accordingly to the institution before the court of appropriate jurisdiction returned to the plaintiff.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
