Sections 366, 233, 367 and 537 Panel Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 302/324/337 F (iii) / 337 A (ii) / 148/149 Qatl a amd, attempt to commit Qutel Um, from which Notified, and Shuja-e-Mujahid made it unlawful and unlawful to make a permanent decision in two separate cases, which during the course of the trial allowed the accused to conduct two separate cases in challan case and private complaint against the complainant of the challan case trial court. Later, a private complaint was lodged with the jail. In which separate allegations were made, separate evidence was recorded and separate sets of accused were examined under Section 342, CR PC, the written verdict was a judicial decision in which a case was filed. The decision is made which should include points for determination, discussion and reasons. ; And explain any part of the offense and the law under which the accused was convicted and sentenced was the result of which the court heard the confession. And the resulting prosecution against the offender's identity was always a crime, not a crime. There can be multiple crimes at the same time, and the court should review every crime, not just the incident once the crime has been settled, but the court is obliged to decide the case through a full trial. ? Using the powers provided by the Code of Conduct that since the incident was the same or because the crime was committed during the same transaction, there could have been a conclusive decision, was a wrong approach that was not valid. Each case must have a separate decision and the decision must contain the points of determination, the decision and the decision
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
