MST. NOREEN ASHIQ versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, KHARIAN
Article 5 Schedule and Section 17 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Section 11 and AXXIII, R1 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional Petition as a Wedding Gift to the Plaintiff for Recovering Dowry Articles, including Gold Ornaments The return of the gold jewelry claim granted to the claimant is felt to be inadequate to mention that the defendant's mention in Column 17 of the marriage contract is still inadequate to be recovered as a dowry acquisition. That the fresh suit for jewelry was not retained in accordance with the section 11, CPC claim. The case was unlawfully withdrawn by the Family Court, which was dismissed by the Family Court by the Appellate Court. Except for Articles 10 and 11 of the CPC, it shall not apply to proceedings before the Family Court under section 17 of the West Pakistan Family Courts Act 1964. Do not apply for a retraction, but the decision has not been made so that the plaintiff's income can be obtained through their personal property.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
