Find a Lawyer

ASAD ULLAH versus STATE

Section 6 Control6 of the Narcotic Materials Act (XXV of 1997), Section 9 (c) The suspension of drug addicts, the accused was sentenced to a fine of Rs. The plea bargaining by the lawyer on the aggravating grounds and deep testimony of the evidence, which could not be presented at the present stage, was dismissed, in the circumstances.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011

• NASIR alias NASRI v. State 2011 YLR 576
• Mst. NOREEN ASHIQ v. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, KHARIAN 2011 PLD 579
• ADDITIONAL ACCOUNTANT-GENERAL PAKISTAN REVENUE, LAHORE v. A.A. ZUBERI 2011 PLC(CS) 580
• MUHAMMAD YASIN v. State 2011 PLD 583
• KAMRAN KHAN v. State 2011 YLR 586
• MUHAMMAD AKHTAR v. SENIOR MEMBER BOARD OF REVENUE 2011 MLD 589
• REHAN v. State 2011 PCrLJ 589
• MUHAMMAD ZAMAN v. SHAH MUHAMMAD 2011 YLR 591

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2011 →

top advocate from Bunner lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes