Section 497 (2) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), section 302/365 B / 201/34 of Qatil Ahmed, kidnapping, causes the disappearance of the evidence of the crime, further, Expressed strong conviction. The defendant's guilt in the case, but he failed to point to any information in the FIR or during the investigation, no witness was registered during the investigation to support the complainant's request by police. Was. Suspecting the accused involved in a malicious event, neither can be able to accept powerful evidence nor can it be equated with evidence, even though direct or circumstantial, the accused may be entitled to bail. , If its case otherwise falls under the scope of further investigation as contemplated under section 497 (2), the CCPC trial may not be relevant at the bail-out stage, and neither That alone could be considered a hindrance to the grant. F. The defendant's bail was not found in the incident that occurred during the inquiry, and his name appeared in column number 2 of the challan prima facie, reasonably available to believe that in the case of the accused, Further investigations into his crime have been called. According to section 497 (2), the PC accused, under the circumstances, was admitted on bail
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
