Article 199 Constitutional Application The applicant challenged the Bachelor's Degree in Engineering from the University on the basis that between 1 00 and 1 50 on a grade point average, the student could be convicted or withdrawn but the risk He should have been punished because of the lesser punishment and had to be evicted. University officials claimed that the applicant had failed to meet the university's highest standards and that the qualification authority was developed by the authority and that the first semester had a grade point average of 1 00 in letter and spirit. Had to act accordingly. Define one of the two motifs. Whenever two interpretations of the Constitution / Rules or Regulations are possible, an interpretation supporting this topic should be applied instead of withdrawing this option as it not only affected the student but also his family. Will also be taken to an endless harassment. The University Committee KRS should use its discretion with welfare. Young people should not be in despair / disconnect and young students should be useful members of society. The opportunity to become an unmanaged order cannot be ignored. Name of the administration's policy, which at the same time reduced the punishment, the High Court allowed the constitutional application to instruct the university authorities to continue their education.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
