Find a Lawyer

KHADIM HUSSAIN versus PUNJAB LABOUR APPELLATE TRIBUNAL

Article 199 Constitutional Application Industrial Dispute Scenario and Promotion Petitioner joined the Water Works Department a few months before the respondents, but after that the applicant changed the aforementioned department and joined the Disposal Works Department when the applicant chose. Left a department, so they could not claim the seniority of the previous department when an employee left their department and joined another, the rule of the seniority was to list the new / joining department's seniority list. The final will be when the following decisions have been passed. Given all the material aspects of the case, the following conclusions would not be appropriate to interfere with the constitutional jurisdiction of the High Court Petition based on the material on record.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011

• PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through Member, Board of Revenue v. ANWAR JALIL 2011 MLD 196
• AURANGZEB SHAH BURKI v. PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through Chief Secretary 2011 PLD 198
• PEHLWAN MARBLE FACTORY through Muhammad Asif v. State 2011 PCrLJ 200
• KHADIM HUSSAIN v. PUNJAB LABOUR APPELLATE TRIBUNAL 2011 PLC 200
• Syed ZAIDI HASSAN SHAH v. FAIZ-UR-REHMAN SHAH 2011 CLC 205
• IBRAR MERAN v. JUDGE FAMILY COURT, DISTRICT GUJRAT 2011 YLR 206
• Sardar TALIB HUSSAIN NAKAI v. Rana MUHAMMAD HAYAT 2011 PLD 207
• DAYYAM ATTA TAREEN v. MUST 2011 CLC 211

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2011 →

top advocate from Sanghi lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes