O. XXXVII, Two suits for recovery of money on the basis of pro note except R 2 The plaintiff has filed two separate cases against two different defendants for recovery of pro note based amount and evidence by the parties' trial court. In the second case, the verdict and decree of the functional evidence of one case were reproduced and the evidence of the effect of one case cannot be orally transmitted to another case. It cannot be said precisely that in which case the evidence was recorded and subsequently transferred to the other, such a procedure would be alien to the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, and would cause serious injustice. And fight against all natural principles. The Justice Trial Court, while seizing two different cases, did not give any specific reason why the evidence was recorded in only one case and the other was transferred, the unknown order was also set aside and the affidavit was affirmed. After making a new verdict, the case was remanded. Both sides present evidence
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
