SARDAR TALIB HUSSAIN NAKAI versus RANA MUHAMMAD HAYAT
Article 62 and Constitution 64 Constitution of Pakistan, Article Q 199 Q Constituent Evidence (10 of 1984 1984), Article 114 Notification No.1 F1 (7) / 87, before the Constitutional Evidence Tribunal Evidence 173 1985, Local Recording the Commissioner's Appointment and the Estoppel Election Tribunal, the Commissioner appointed the local commissioner for the recording of the evidence at the parties' request, with the consent of the candidates; Was not obliged to remove the evidence of each of them completely. So that the appointment of a local commission to remove the evidence of the parties did not face any prejudice and was merely a mechanism to facilitate the Election Tribunal to deal with the election petition quickly. Notification No. F1 (7) / 87, dated 17, 1985, has been printed in the Election Tribunal capable of hearing the election petition in accordance with the procedural press, in which to take any such legal action on the Election Tribunal. There may be a restriction which may advance the purpose of the instant decision of the election petition before it can be compared I consented to the appointment of the commission, paid my fees and participated in the process of recording the evidence which was in the final stages; the applicant / returning candidate was stopped pending an objection, which in any case Was of a technical nature would serve as such. There is no beneficial purpose other than delaying the finalization of election applications and thereby making the decision for election applications.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
