SHAHEEN COTTON MILLS, LAHORE versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN, MINISTRY OF COMMERCE THROUGH SECRETARY
Articles 18 and 38 express legal trade or business as used in Article 18 of the Constitution shall not be readily attributed to any constitution in any constitutional document, such Article in the context of the whole Constitution. Must be read and it will be interpreted by influencing everyone. The terms and expressions used in it are not lawful trade or business expression, lawful trade or business is excessive; meaningless, irrelevant or excessive fundamental rights guaranteed under the Constitution may not exist in isolation and Neither can be used in any space, so they must be read. In such a way that every right is subject to the other, otherwise being a living document conflicts with the other right constitution, the interpretation of its provisions must be dynamic rather than strategic and flexible as such. This can be guaranteed under Article. The Government is not prohibited under reasonable qualifications and regulations to create a state monopoly in connection with the services of any trade, business, industry or citizens in the exclusion of any provision of the Constitution guaranteed under this Article Cannot be explained or excluded from which the State shall be subject to its responsibility. There was no legal and legal obligation to protect the well-being of our citizens and to promote and protect employment, to harmonize or uphold such rights with the competing fundamental right of another person. The right of any trade or business to be limited by law
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
