Section 42 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), A XXXX, Rr 1, 2 Suit with the Appeal Court's Appeal for Temporary Approval of Trial, The Case was that they had the Allottee ? The disputed land and they converted the said land into a farming place, but despite the fact that the plaintiffs were not given proprietary rights, the disputed land was resumed by a competent authority in the year 1970 and legalized on various forums. Because the plaintiff was in possession of the disputed land, the disputed land was put up for auction, but the defendants did not participate in the auction proceedings. This record revealed that the plaintiffs filed a constitutional petition to seek injunction. Which was unsuccessful and this fact was not disclosed by the plaintiffs Was. In the plaintiff's case, on appeal, and in the review before the High Court, the fact that the plaintiffs were legal houses denied the High Court's interference with the conclusions of the courts by evidence \ r \ nThe following review request was dismissed.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
