Find a Lawyer

MUNAWAR MEHMOOD versus NADEEM SIDDIQUI

O VI, R 17 Amendments to Applications New Application Guarantee Application Suite was filed on 26 10 2007 and application for amendment of applications was filed on 24 3 2010 Both the courts dismissed the application and any appeal filed by the plaintiffs Explanation failed. The request filed by the plaintiffs not to comply with the requests made by the proposed amendments in the initial phase of the trial meant only a door-to-door proof-of-law was not allowed to obtain the plaintiff indirectly. That cannot be directly obtained. Orders were issued in accordance with the law and the plaintiff failed to identify any illegal and material misconduct, or that the courts failed to exercise their jurisdiction over which the High Court allowed the modification of the applications. Denied

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011

• SHAHEEN COTTON MILLS, LAHORE v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN, MINISTRY OF COMMERCE through Secretary 2011 PLD 120
• SHUMAILA RAZA v. DISTRICT OFFICER 2011 YLR 125
• RASHEED alias SHEEDA v. State 2011 PCrLJ 129
• HAQ NAWAZ v. MACHHIA 2011 MLD 129
• MUHAMMAD YOUSAF v. A.S.J. 2011 YLR 131
• PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through Executive Engineering v. AMMICO CONSTRUCTION (PVT.) LIMITED, LAHORE 2011 MLD 135
• TARIQ AHMAD FAROOQI v. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, LAHORE 2011 YLR 138
• MUHAMMAD RAMZAN v. State 2011 PCrLJ 140

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2011 →

online advocate from Fateh Pur lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes