Sections 302, 324, 337 L (2) and 337 F (ii) Qatil-e-Amal, the attempted murder of the killer, the injury, the non-confessional evidence of doubt, the benefit of the doubt was at the wedding ceremony because the eyewitnesses were not merely witnesses. His presence at the scene was regularly explained, so the complainant's sole evidence was sufficient to maintain the conviction of the accused as the recovery of the gun was not important as there was no vacancy. The prosecutor recovered from the crime scene could not specify the motive for the crime before the gathering of more than 100 people when he could have done so at another location or the prosecutor's version at the time was not according to the medical evidence. Is. It should not be denied that no reason was established for its misinterpretation or substitution of someone else. The accused was entitled to some exceptions as the benefit of doubt had to be exercised in favor of the accused while giving punishment. High Court upholds conviction of convict and turns his death sentence to life imprisonment
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
