The Law Reform Ordinance of the Arts 25 (XII of 1972), admission to the Section 3 Educational Institute Medical College, `open merit 'and" self-finance base "discrimination appeals to government medical colleges on the basis of self-finance schemes. If the seats allotted for self-finance schemes were included in Open Merit then they could be admitted, hence, they were discriminated against by the authorities. Velidity Open Merit seats and self-finance based seats. There were two different categories, as the prospectus shows The prospectus intended for related sessions Was provided in advance and all students, who applied for admission on the basis of the Self Finance Scheme, were fully aware of the rules that the Appellant was required to enter the Self Finance Scheme under any rigorous and oppressive application. The rules and regulations set forth in the prospectus clearly stated that the student who enrolled on the self-financing set-up was usually charged a fee plus 250. , 000 per annum, which is bound to be paid every year, till the completion of its MBBS / BDS course Self-financing. Intravenous did not scheme. Violation of the fundamental rights of citizens' equality as provided in Article 25 of the Constitution meant equality between individuals, which was classified equally by equality and legally allowed to compete against students. Appellants had obtained fewer numbers. Those who were admitted against the seats were allotted to open merit, and as such they were not located
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
