Sections 2 302 (b), 7 33iv f (iv) and 7 337l (2) convictions of Qatil-e-Adm, non-Jaffa Modia and other guilty evidence, the reduction of the circumstances of the shortage was according to the ocular account medical evidence, immediately. On the FIR filed, the small scope for harassing a false story cannot be disputed with the identity of the accused as the incident was known throughout the day in light of the accused witnesses. In view of the pending litigation between the accused and the accused pistol, the prosecution had fully proved the crime. And TAPPA recovered on the indictment of the suspects and supported the prosecution's case, because the wounds found on the victim were due to a firearm complaint that was the mother of the deceased and injured during the incident. ? As a prisoner in the house, she was a natural witness. There was no record of the accused making false allegations, even though his case has been proved, but there were mitigating circumstances. The accused dragged the victim's wife out of her parents' house on the road. It is likely that he intended to take her with him against his will, but he was shot when he resisted the injuries to the witnesses, and it was reinforced that the accused. He did not shoot the same shot and did not repeat the shot. With the younger age of the accused, his death sentence was converted to life imprisonment and the death sentence was not confirmed and negative response was given regarding the murder.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
