Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ASLAM versus MST. RASHIDAN BIBI

The factual findings by the courts under the trial court for the retrieval of the trial possession case ruled in favor of the defendants on the issue that the defendants had forcibly evicted them and the trial court. The order passed by was retained by the appellant. Against the defendants, the two courts reached the judgment and orders after weighing the evidence led by the parties, as well as finding that the exchange memorandum was implemented and obtained through exchange. The defendants were in possession of the property, the defendants were unable to state or otherwise establish, and did not lie in the defendants' claim to claim that the memorandum of exchange had not taken place when the High Court made concurrent decisions and interventions. Was refused so the review was excluded in approved cases \ r \ n \ r \ n

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011

• SAIMA GUL v. State 2011 YLR 72
• BERRY FOOD INDUSTRIES v. MUSLIM COMMERCIAL BANK LTD 2011 CLD 75
• TARIQ MAHMOOD v. State 2011 PLD 76
• Mst. AYESHA NASEER v. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, PAKPATTAN SHARIF 2011 YLR 78
• MUHAMMAD JAN v. State 2011 MLD 82
• HAQ NAWAZ v. State 2011 PLD 84
• MUHAMMAD AKRAM v. GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB through Secretary 2011 PCrLJ 85
• ABDUL REHMAN alias GAGI v. State 2011 PLD 92

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2011 →

famous high court advocate from Jatoi lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes