BERRY FOOD INDUSTRIES versus MUSLIM COMMERCIAL BANK LTD
Sections 9 and 10 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Section 144 Bank Debt Collection Suite claims to recover Rs 117,922 70 for defending the bank by agreeing to the cost of funds @ Rs 761 paisa per thousand daily The defendant petitioned for leave was requested that he did not sign the execution of the charge and the defendant also applied for a refund of Rs 600,000 under section 144, CPC. Was submitted by him on partial liability, the banking court approved the first verdict by the banking court to stop the execution. , Both the defendant's requests were rejected by a stable judgment and decree. Defendant's dispute with regard to the allegations of compliance and security documents was uneventful and the ambiguous statement showed that the provision of the facility began in the year 2000, with the help of any legal CC disputing the validity of the documents. Despite this fake and fabricated verdict, which was filed about 10 years ago, it effectively rejects the applicant's defense / dispute that the documents were not executed by him. Ali's assertion that the application under section 144 should not be made to the CPC. Defending this case was decided not only with the leave application but also because the first decision should have been made, without any serious consequences, and in particular to deny her request to defend the case. Without any technical objection. Banking Court Decisions and Interventions by Banking Court
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
