MST. AYESHA NASEER versus DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, PAKPATTAN SHARIF
Article 199 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), 491 Constitutional Petition The petitioner's father died in order to issue a writ in the nature of a corporation and he was in custody because of the applicant's mother through the petitioner. Filed Under / Guardian & Wards Act, 1890 For the appointment of mother as guardian of the minor and guardian of the property, the Guardian Judge Petitioner filed an application under section 491, CRPC, which is alleged That the respondents who were the maternal grandparents and maternal grandfathers respectively. The minors, who had abducted the minors, said the petition was rejected by the trial court, the applicant filed a constitutional petition before the respondents / alleged abductors, saying that since the death of the minor's father. The juveniles were in his custody and he questioned. Serious accusations were made against the applicant's character and all the applicant's minors, who were intelent legends, good-behaving and adult, not only mentally but physically, but also to their mother about their moral character. Repeats the allegations. The minor had been living with relatives since his father's death and had refused to live with his mother's petitioner. / Mother could not conclusively prove that when the minor was removed from his custody, usually in constitutional petitions, including those seeking a writ of habeas corpus, the High Court did not enter into a factual dispute. Nor has it been investigated in detail. In such cases, yes
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
