Section 497 (2) Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), Sections 302/34/404 Conviction AMD and dishonestly unlawful guarantee of property available to the deceased at the time of his death, grant of further investigation was an unexpected event and the accused. There were no FIR nominees and prosecutors presented two different sets of evidence last seen against the accused. If both victims were taken with the legacy of an additional statement from the prosecution's witness, their verdict would be pronounced only at the trial, police allegedly recovered a pistol from the suspect's possession, but allegedly from the car. Empty cartridge was not recovered on. According to the report of the recovery of the forensic science laboratory, the pistol recovered from the suspect's possession, in which case, there was no piece of evidence relating to the recovery of the mobile phone from the suspect's possession, appears to have been the first suspect. After further investigation into the scope of the accused, the accused were admitted on bail in the circumstances.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
