Find a Lawyer

KANWAR MUHAMMAD NAEEM versus BOARD OF INTERMEDIATE AND SECONDARY EDUCATION, MULTAN

Arts 4, 25 and 199 were employees of the Constitution Right of Education Disclaimer Petitioner Board and the complaint was that the authorities refused to allow them to appear in the BA Part II exam. Legal education is a fundamental right of every citizen and authorities cannot deny the applicant's right. Learn and appear in BA Part II Exam Two other employees were allowed to appear in BA Examination, thus denying any of the applicant's right to appear in BA Part II exam. There was no reasonable and reasonable reason for the authorities' denial of the right to appear in the BA Part II Examination was inherently discriminatory. Provide the necessary permits to the applicant for the High Court directed further authorities to facilitate the applicant while This is to allow for the appropriate holiday.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011

• MUHAMMAD WASIF KHAN v. State 2011 PCrLJ 470
• CHAND BAGH FOUNDATION v. STANDARD CHARTERED BANK LIMITED 2011 PLD 473
• HABIBULLAH KHAN v. State 2011 MLD 473
• ASIF ALI v. State 2011 YLR 479
• SULTAN AHMAD v. GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB through Secretary Irrigation, Punjab 2011 PLC(CS) 480
• FARAZ AHMAD BHUTTA v. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE 2011 PLD 483
• AHMAD HASSAN v. State 2011 YLR 483
• Mst. SUMAIRA NOREEN v. DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER (COLLEGES) SIALKOT 2011 PLC(CS) 485

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2011 →

how to become a advocate from Sita Road lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes