Find a Lawyer

ASIF ALI versus STATE

Appreciation of Section C (C) drug possession A confessional statement by a co-accused raised suspicion that the suspect was arrested from the airport because he was charged by prosecution and possessed by heroin. Was recovered from, and an unsubstantiated request was submitted. The evidence was not sufficient to refute the evidence brought to the record by the prosecution. Heroin was recovered from the airport by the suspect and the section 103. , The CRPC provisions were excluded by Section 25 of the Control of Narcotic Substances Act 1997, Non-participation of the private witnesses with action had no negative effect in terms of prosecution appeal was dismissed in circumstances

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011

• MUHAMMAD YAQOOB v. A.D.J. 2011 YLR 470
• MUHAMMAD WASIF KHAN v. State 2011 PCrLJ 470
• CHAND BAGH FOUNDATION v. STANDARD CHARTERED BANK LIMITED 2011 PLD 473
• HABIBULLAH KHAN v. State 2011 MLD 473
• Kanwar MUHAMMAD NAEEM v. BOARD OF INTERMEDIATE AND SECONDARY EDUCATION, MULTAN 2011 PLD 479
• SULTAN AHMAD v. GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB through Secretary Irrigation, Punjab 2011 PLC(CS) 480
• FARAZ AHMAD BHUTTA v. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE 2011 PLD 483
• AHMAD HASSAN v. State 2011 YLR 483

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2011 →

patent advocate from Tharparkar lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes