Find a Lawyer

MST. MISBAH FATIMA versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB THROUGH SECRETARY

Article 199 General Clause Act (X of 1897), a constitutional application of teachers in Sections 24 and 24 of the Department of Education to provide the applicant with a civil service appointment, without cause, to issue notice or to serve the applicant after serving eleven. Cancellation order without appointment. 11) The order of appointment of the applicant with effective and diligence of months was neither illegal nor contrary to the provisions of any law nor issued by any unqualified authority. Subsequent appointment order was passed The respondent did not have the authority to withdraw such appointment order without any justification. It is not alleged that the applicant obtained the appointment order by fraud or misrepresentation. Respondents had no strong possibility of returning any such order after it was executed. The Petitioner had acquired a monopoly right, which could not be redeemed or withdrawn without the opportunity provided to him. The Supreme Court heard the invalid order as illegal and without any legal authority

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011

• MUHAMMAD SHAFI v. DISTRICT COORDINATION OFFICER, MULTAN 2011 PCrLJ 1482
• DOST MUHAMMAD v. E.D.O. (R) 2011 YLR 1482
• SUGRAN BIBI v. State 2011 YLR 1486
• MIAN CNG FILLING STATION through Managing Partner v. SNGPL 2011 YLR 1491
• Mst. NUSRAT PARVEEN v. ABDUL GHAFOOR 2011 YLR 1495
• Mst. KAUSAR BIBI v. State 2011 PCrLJ 1495
• MUHAMMAD BOOTA v. MUHAMMAD SADIQ 2011 YLR 1497
• RUKHSANA JABEEN v. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE 2011 CLC 1498

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2011 →

law websites from Sherani lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes