Find a Lawyer

RUKHSANA JABEEN versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE

Sections 13 and 15 (6) of the Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 The order to be removed from the controller by the appellate authority, separated by the appellate authority, instead of filing another appeal in the High Court of Mentorship, the constitutional application filed by Pardasin Land Maldi Also suffer from scope defects. As the applicant was a manly woman, she was not accustomed to legal procedures and working in court. And how to be law The law gives women preferential treatment. This disqualification of the Constitutional Petition resulted in unlawful order and the applicant has to face fresh litigation under the new law and justice from the last four courts. It takes all their effort to achieve. The year proves that the High Court rejected the Constitution.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011

• Mst. MISBAH FATIMA v. PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through Secretary 2011 MLD 1494
• Mst. NUSRAT PARVEEN v. ABDUL GHAFOOR 2011 YLR 1495
• Mst. KAUSAR BIBI v. State 2011 PCrLJ 1495
• MUHAMMAD BOOTA v. MUHAMMAD SADIQ 2011 YLR 1497
• GHULAM SARWAR v. MEMBER (JUDICIAL-VII) 2011 MLD 1502
• Ch. MUHAMMAD SHAHZAD ASLAM NAZ v. SPECIAL JUDGE (RENT), MULTAN 2011 CLC 1503
• MUHAMMAD IQBAL v. State 2011 YLR 1506
• KHAN GUL v. SECRETARY RTA, RAWALPINDI 2011 YLR 1507

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2011 →

immigration advocates phone number from Jehanian lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes