Find a Lawyer

MIAN CNG FILLING STATION THROUGH MANAGING PARTNER versus SNGPL

Arts 25 and 199 Constitutional Application Distribution Policy Case The applicant's complaint of natural gas supply was that the respondent company could not stop the supply of natural gas to its gas station and had discriminated against it. At the time, the applicant agreed that there would be a right to shut down or disrupt the supply of natural gas. Had decided to halt gas supply. Natural gas was applied without discrimination throughout the country, the respondent company correctly pointed out that a letter stating that the gas was stopped was simply a federal government policy. Which was issued in accordance with the federal government policy, the applicant did not challenge the federal government. High court refuses to intervene in the policy under which the Federal Government Arrangements imposed a weekly ban on gas supply to compressed natural gas stations.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011

• NAHEED SIKANDER v. NAEEM IJAZ 2011 CLC 1479
• MUHAMMAD SHAFI v. DISTRICT COORDINATION OFFICER, MULTAN 2011 PCrLJ 1482
• DOST MUHAMMAD v. E.D.O. (R) 2011 YLR 1482
• SUGRAN BIBI v. State 2011 YLR 1486
• Mst. MISBAH FATIMA v. PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through Secretary 2011 MLD 1494
• Mst. NUSRAT PARVEEN v. ABDUL GHAFOOR 2011 YLR 1495
• Mst. KAUSAR BIBI v. State 2011 PCrLJ 1495
• MUHAMMAD BOOTA v. MUHAMMAD SADIQ 2011 YLR 1497

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2011 →

divorce advocates from Feroz Walla lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes