Sections 308 and 201 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (V9 1898), Sections 561A, 237, S35 and 537 Qatl are not liable for the offense, which resulted in the disappearance of the complainant on account of missing evidence of the crime. And in the private version, it was inconsistent to complain about the extra-judicial confession by the accused, and his co-accused said that the extra-judicial confession was not proof of the joint, the trial court acquitted the accused. Was dismissed and the appeal filed against him was dismissed by the High Court for this piece of evidence of prosecution, therefore, without the independent support of the accused. What could have, which was lacking in this case, resulting in the accused was acquitted of the charges under Section 308, PPC accused, the dead were recovered after the arrest. After digging the ground from the courtyard of his house, the body of the deceased said the body was restored, no doubt he was killed by the accused, but the prosecution's evidence and the circumstances of the case proved that his trial The murder was committed by the court, the accused was not charged under section 2, PPC, for causing the disappearance of the deceased appellant's body. The court had sufficient powers to look at the material available on record under Sections 561A, 237, 535 and 537, CCPC, and could not convict the offender of a particular offense for punishing according to law. There will be irregularities. As a result of not prosecuting the trial, the accused was sentenced under Section 2, PPC and sentenced to imprisonment, up to a fine of Rs. Imposed, that is
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
