MUHAMMAD SHAFI versus DISTRICT COORDINATION OFFICER, MULTAN
Section 3 Constitution Pakistan, Article 199 Constitution Petition The detention order contained orders for detention based on the recommendation of the City Police Officer, stating that only one of the applicants was involved in three criminal cases while the other two. The culprits were shown to be involved. Except for cases related to cattle theft and the registration of the FI Rupees, which was pending for hearing in the respective courts, there was no evidence against the two applicants for any activity connected with it. Can be called prejudice. None of the aforementioned cases against the applicants for public safety or public order restoration were approved. The fact is that applicants were involved in a number of criminal cases, when there was no reasonable basis for preventing this person. The prosecution was prosecuted under a criminal charge, similar material should not be deemed appropriate in any way on the basis of ordering detention where substantial charges against Detenio were brought, and subsequently on Ditto. While legal proceedings were underway, it would not normally be open to use by officials such as preventive detention charges under the Public Order Ordinance under the West Pakistan Restoration. , 1960 If the prosecution has been able to prove a criminal charge against the accused, then he may be punished, otherwise he may be acquitted, but if he was detained before the indictment, it would be The principles of criminal administration of justice will be violated and unless they are there
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
