Sections 497 and 426 (1A) (C) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), section 302/34 Qatil Ahmed bail, the accused's grant was arrested on 16 3 2009, while the co-accused was arrested on 10 3 2009. Arrested and since their arrest, the two accused have been continuously detained in jail, charged, acquitted of legal rights under the circumstances, Video Proso (C) of Section 426 (1A) was introduced. , CRPC cases in which the accused were detained, should have been preferred. The accused's right was not liable for the delay in the trial when a special direction was issued by the High Court to expedite the trial, to be followed by the trial court in order to comply with the same direction. Will be. Directed by the High Court, which is in line with the law. The bail was considered sufficient to extend the accused to jail while the accused was made on their own fault, when they were no longer wanted for any purpose, they had no benefit to the prosecution. Was used or admitted to a frustrated offender. Guaranteed, in the circumstances
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
