In 1980, authorities filed a lawsuit in section 42 cases for a declaration challenging the bill for the power dissipation bill, based on the trial court's assertion that there was no credible evidence to reverse the disclosure bill. , Which allowed the appeal to be filed by the defendants. In the absence of the plaintiffs, the plaintiff was examined by the authorities / officials No notice was issued to the plaintiffs to show cause before the issuance of the bills or assessment regarding loss of authority which included high consumption meters. CTs (current transfers) were fitted with the device and also with the MDI (Maximum Demand Indicator) meter. The contentious contact was paired with such devices, in the presence of regular and regular scrutiny by authorities, alleged misconduct by consumers was not possible because the High Court refused to interfere with the revised jurisdiction. Refused
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
