Sections 397 and 561 of the Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 393, 392 and 411 of attempted theft of stolen property were punished by the accused who reached the deadline. No such exemption was given to the accused during his appeal or revision hearing by the High Court, but it was also arbitrary that his sentence be executed along with subsequent convictions. Go but It cannot be used mechanically even in the usual case. Such a waiver cannot be applied only as an exception as a rule when the court can agree to find out that all crimes committed during the collection of ordinary offenses, The accused wanted by the present FIR was acquitted at a particular time. All crimes were committed with distinguished and separate criminal motives, which were tried in three different places and the accused was convicted in different places. Running his sentences together, when the events were not the result of a series of actions towards the commission of the crime, they were not interlinked and were completely different from dates, times and places. r \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
