Section 666 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), section 417 (2) Special leave to appeal against criminal threats, the refusal of the parties was already in the palms, where the complainant's workshop was also held in a market. Was. None of the eligible witnesses was presented to endorse this version, eye witnesses were witnesses of confession, who failed to justify their presence at the relevant time, then Aini. Witnesses opposed the day of the incident, there was no slight contradiction as witnesses tried to establish their presence on Sunday, the holiday, according to the complainant, with the latest weapons. They were equipped, but neither aerial firing nor any injuries were reported. Complainant complainant's case was suspicious, which had the benefit of the accused, the sentence could not be recorded simply on the hype, he was charged after his victory that he had double benefit of corruption, which only if Can be rejected when the verdict of evil on his face appears to be misleading, disobedient and illegal, without being subjected to any illegal, irregular, malicious, false advertising or reading the evidence. The petition was restricted
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
